Journalism (2) – give us a clue?

So, having secured your prized job as a tea maker and trainee journalist, what does the training involve?

In the UK, you could (at the time) enter journalism through a number of routes:

  • direct entry onto a newspaper with, usually, A-levels
  • taking a one-year journalism course after school
  • getting a direct entry job as a graduate
  • taking a one-year post-grad course.

The first involved a tedious long apprenticeship.

The second meant a shortened apprenticeship and with a pre-qualification in shorthand.

I discounted the fourth on a) grounds of far too much competition to get into the few universities offering the courses and b) why do another year without a job if you can get a job immediately and still end up with the same qual? Doing the post-grad course only shortened your indentures, it didn’t give you a pass for the all-important National Certificate.

Entering as a graduate meant a load of snotty comments if you happened to be the first grad on the newspaper though. But it did mean very short block-release college training, presumably on the grounds that if you had a degree, you might not need to spend years boning up on the essential subjects.

‘We’ve not had any graduates on this newspaper before.’

‘Don’t know why we need someone with a degree, they just think they know everything..’

‘Graduates don’t know how to write.’

That last one was true actually.

I carefully wrote my first story like a university essay. I wrote an introductory paragraph about the whole theme, discussed the issues, and made a conclusion.

This was a ten or twelve paragraph council story, not a 1000 word essay about Augustus Caesar.

I had a lot to learn.

It seemed the end should come first. Um? Whatever happened to my carefully crafted essay? Arse about front really. Get that hard-hitting news point in the first par and then witter on about how you got there.

Really, I thought. Such terrible writing.

I peppered my stories with the lady expressed, the gentleman replied.

Big no. Just no, no and no again.

Apparently there were no ladies. The whole office churned out the mantra. ‘There are no ladies in this town, only Lady Whatshername.’ Who happened to be a genuinely titled lady that had a residence in the town, for some reason that was beyond me.

A lady was to be called a woman. I was shocked I tell you. I had been brought up to believe that all persons of the female sex aspired to be ladies and that woman/women was such a derogatory term for rather rough persons. Like fishwives. Dear me. What had I got myself into?

Next, no one expressed, replied, stated, explained, or asked.

‘Said is a perfectly good word,’ said the DCR (the one of the previous post). I supposed it saved taxing the brain. I dutifully and sadly wrote said instead of my inspired variations.

My copy was poured over and criticised. I wilted like a delicate flower whenever it didn’t meet approval.

We had to ring people to interview them over the ‘phone in the open-plan office and everyone could hear my inadequate interviews. It was all so embarrassing.

Sometimes, we couldn’t hear the person we were speaking to because of the noise of the typewriters clack clack clacking away. When that happened, the accepted office procedure was to catch everyone’s eye, wave your one free arm in a horizontal motion, and the office fell silent. And natch, everyone listened to your conversation.

Even worse, was when you had got hold of someone important, some local bigwig or whoever, for a very serious interview. Colleagues would wander over and try to distract you. Tickle you. Pull faces. Anything to catch your eye and make you snort laughing when you were discussing the state of the nation, and trying to get a meaningful quote from The Bigwig.

When I joined the team, there were three reporters who had done the one-year training course after school, two direct-entry reporters who had joined after school, and me. I was the only one who had zilch shorthand.

After not too long, I was despatched to The Big Newspaper office in the city where shorthand classes were held for all trainees within the group.

This involved wandering up to the railway station on Monday lunchtime, a pleasant 20 mins or so on the train, and a couple of hours grafting away in the afternoon. I did get home a bit later than normal, but still, it was a nice change.

It was at shorthand I met the two reporters from the sister paper. The non-nepotistic editor really had hired two junior reporters. I could see why I didn’t get a look in with my red-brick university degree.

One of my colleagues had a degree in either PPE or Politics from Cambridge, and the other one had read English at Durham. And this is a bog-standard weekly paper.

As an aside, I always found it fascinating that people seemed to think an English degree was a pre-requisite for being a journalist. Given that an English degree is about a) studying literature and b) studying Anglo-Saxon and other such oddities I can’t really see the relevance to current-day journalism.

Politics or PPE yes. My own degree of history too. Because what you learn in history is to ask questions, research, not take things on face value, and track down as many sources as possible. Pretty appropriate for a journalist I would have thought?

I hit it off well with my two colleagues though, and looked forward to Monday afternoons.

Wednesday afternoons were the best however. The paper went to bed (ie got printed) on Wednesday, so there was stuff all to do. I was absolutely gobsmacked the first time the office started playing charades. Even the editor would wander in for a laugh. That’s when he hadn’t gone for a sauna.

In fact, it wasn’t charades per se, it was the television variant, ‘Give us a Clue.’ Those of you who remember it, will know exactly what I mean, those of you who don’t can look it up.

It was something on the lines of film, book, musical, can’t remember what else. And obviously you had to enact it. Whoever guessed first, got to go next. Luckily I was utterly useless at guessing so I rarely, if ever, got to do the enactment scene. So, so, embarrassing. Even worse than interviewing people over the ‘phone when everyone else could hear.

Sometimes we even played on Fridays too. Fridays was POETS day (although I didn’t learn the phrase until I joined the civil service where it was also POETS day), but we left the newspaper office at 4pm instead of the usual 4.30pm.

Aside from charades, shorthand, and those awful ‘phone calls, my training was pretty decent. I was taken to council meetings and court by senior reporters, who introduced me to people, showed me the ropes, and we both took down the stories together so I could attempt a few of my own.

Some time later I was chatting to another (graduate) junior reporter from the daily paper in the group, and he said he envied our all-round and thorough training that he didn’t feel he got on a busy paper.

The truth is, it was all so novel and strange, I was caught up in the whirlwind of actually being a trainee journalist. Perhaps the most exciting moments were just answering the ‘phone when it rang and saying, ‘Hello, reporters.’ We didn’t say ‘Newsroom’ unlike our stuffy upthemselves sister paper, and one of my colleagues insisted on doing it with an American accent which was pretty bizarre in the middle of Yorkshire.

Some years later another colleague on a different paper was having a difficult conversation with an irate punter, and she said sadly ‘I’m just a reporter.’

Then she put the ‘phone down and said: ‘Why on earth did I say that? I AM A REPORTER.’

Anyone who makes it into journalism, passes their exams, and holds down a hard, not usually very well-paid job, is not just a reporter.

Next: indentures, college, and – exams!

Advertisements

About roughseasinthemed

I write about my life as an English person living in Spain and Gibraltar, on Roughseas, subjects range from politics and current developments in Gib to book reviews, cooking and getting on with life. My views and thoughts on a variety of topics - depending on my mood of the day - can be found over on Clouds. A few pix are over on Everypic - although it is not a photoblog. And of course my dog had his own blog, but most of you knew that anyway. Pippadogblog etc
This entry was posted in journalism, life, media, musings, work, writing and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Journalism (2) – give us a clue?

  1. Nice story – good to read even though I know nothing about journalism!

    Like

  2. Larf gor blimey I howled. This is brilliant!

    As a young spratt, I thought of journalism as a career. However, I have written elsewhere about parental expectation. Your description of trying to use language as wot she should be writ made me smile. As a young upstart being taught the finer points of statement taking I too wrote replied, riposted, answered, conjectured etc etc etc. My style was not appreciated by the very large man with ‘Shiny boots, shiny mind.’ Everything MUST be reduced to a formula (said) ‘Hoo do you fink yoo are, bleeding Wordsworf?’

    He had a point, if the entire group used the same words in the same formulaic way there would be instant understanding, no confusion. It may not be elegant, it may not be enjoyable or entertaining but it get’s the message accross in a comprehensible way.

    Of course Shiny Boots was not dealing with budding journo’s or informing the great british public. I know that is not really the point of what you were entertaining us all with but I had to share with you. Furthermore, I look back fondly to those days now, when faced with statements written by young enthusiastic coppers looking for quick promotion. They now write statements in txt spk lol and kudn spill if ther lif dipend on it. At least in the old days of, ‘I was proceedin’ in a northerly direction …’ everyone understood what the message was.

    Like

    • Thank you. I haven’t even written about the endless court stories where PC Plod really did get up and say that. As you well know. I am a total convert to the (good) journalistic style of writing. It has a purpose, and that is to get a message across in a clear, simple and concise way. More people should try doing that. Unless they are George Eliot or Henry James. I couldn’t cope with txt spk – although – no, I’ll save it for maybe the next post. You’ve just reminded me of something I had totally forgotten. Anyway, I would be sending your young enthusiasts on a writing remedial course if they dished that crap up to me. That or sacking them – I’m sure that wouldn’t be possible though.

      Like

  3. free penny press says:

    Whew.. all that just to want to write a story and have it printed? And yet the market is saturated with journalist. Just goes to show how everybody does want to be a writer. πŸ™‚
    Great story!!!

    Like

    • Is the market really saturated with trained and qualified journalists? Or just people who think they can write?? When I got the job, I was surprised how much there was to learn. While I accept there is appalling journalism out there, I don’t think people appreciate how much goes on behind the scenes in the life of the average provincial journalist. Thanks you.

      Like

      • free penny press says:

        I think you hit the nail on the head.The market is saturated with “wanna-be” writers and when a good writer comes along it makes it difficult for them to get a job. I love to write, but have never taken any sort of writing/journalism classes (my major in college was social work). I think there is much we (the reader) take for granted on how that story got posted.

        Like

        • I loved writing at school, I have to say. Pretty obvious by the amount of blogs I have and the posts I churn out, which incidentally are far longer than the average news post. I’m writing about the exams and stuff at the mo, so that will explain a bit more. It really was a revelation to me..

          Like

  4. Vicky says:

    Journalism is somewhere I would never succeed, firstly there appears to be too much pressure, and the main problem, which I’m embarrassed to admit English in all forms, (lit, spelling grammar etc) was one of my worst subjects at school.

    Like

    • There is loads of pressure without a doubt. It was one of my better subjects. I was gutted there was no english lang A level, although I thought I read a while ago they had introduced it. All of which I should probably thank my mother for because she taught me to read and write before I went to school (aged 4). Having said that, there is far more to journalism than writing – that’s really the finishing off bit. Like any trade, the preparation is the most important.

      Like

I appreciate any comments you leave, so long as they are relatively polite. And thanks for reading.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s