Rape? No.

As we all know, when a 53-year-old man has sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl, it isn’t rape. (Huh?)

It’s sexual activity with with a child. Of course!

So a mere four and a half years sorts that. Easily.



As the girl had come to Bradford from Poland, there was a significant language barrier and it was hard to see how a “relationship” could have developed between them.

About roughseasinthemed

I write about my life as an English person living in Spain and Gibraltar, on Roughseas, subjects range from politics and current developments in Gib to book reviews, cooking and getting on with life. My views and thoughts on a variety of topics - depending on my mood of the day - can be found over on Clouds. A few pix are over on Everypic - although it is not a photoblog. And of course my dog had his own blog, but most of you knew that anyway. Pippadogblog etc
This entry was posted in feminism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Rape? No.

  1. makagutu says:

    Well, friend, that is effed up


  2. davidprosser says:

    Rape, pure and simple. There should be no other verdict.
    xxx Massive Cwtch xxx


    • That’s what I didn’t understand. A 13-year-old girl is under the age of consent. So therefore, why did he get away with a lesser offence of a few years after raping a flipping kid? Disgraceful. And people wonder why I’m feminist?


I appreciate any comments you leave, so long as they are relatively polite. And thanks for reading.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s