As we all know, when a 53-year-old man has sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl, it isn’t rape. (Huh?)
It’s sexual activity with with a child. Of course!
So a mere four and a half years sorts that. Easily.
WTF CPS.
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/15147459.Man__53__had_sex_with_girl__13__and_offered_to_leave_his_wife_and_children_to_marry_her/
As the girl had come to Bradford from Poland, there was a significant language barrier and it was hard to see how a “relationship” could have developed between them.
About roughseasinthemed
I write about my life as an English person living in Spain and Gibraltar, on Roughseas, subjects range from politics and current developments in Gib to book reviews, cooking and getting on with life.
My views and thoughts on a variety of topics - depending on my mood of the day - can be found over on Clouds. A few pix are over on Everypic - although it is not a photoblog.
And of course my dog had his own blog, but most of you knew that anyway. Pippadogblog etc
roughseasinthemed
Clouds moving in 
Well, friend, that is effed up
LikeLike
Subtle Mak! But honest. And I agree.
LikeLike
Rape, pure and simple. There should be no other verdict.
xxx Massive Cwtch xxx
LikeLike
That’s what I didn’t understand. A 13-year-old girl is under the age of consent. So therefore, why did he get away with a lesser offence of a few years after raping a flipping kid? Disgraceful. And people wonder why I’m feminist?
LikeLike